On Monday, court documents revealed that a federal judge in California has rejected a request made by Theranos founder, Elizabeth Holmes, to remain out on bail while appealing her conviction for wire fraud. In January 2022, a jury found Holmes guilty of three counts of wire fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, following which she was sentenced to 11 years in prison and three years of supervised release for defrauding investors of over $100 million for a blood-testing device that was falsely advertised. Holmes appealed her conviction in December 2022.
Holmes had requested that she be allowed to remain free on bail during the appeal process, but the judge denied her request, meaning she will have to serve her sentence in prison unless her appeal is successful.
The case against Holmes and her former company, Theranos, garnered significant attention due to the high-profile nature of the defendant and the allegations of fraud. The case highlighted the dangers of unchecked hype in the tech industry, and the importance of ensuring that scientific claims are backed up by rigorous testing and evidence.
Holmes’ legal team has argued that the prosecution did not provide enough evidence to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the trial was biased against their client. However, the judge in this latest ruling did not find these arguments to be persuasive enough to allow Holmes to remain out on bail.
Holmes will now await the outcome of her appeal while in custody. If her conviction is upheld, she will have to serve her sentence in full.
In order for a defendant to be released during an appeal, the court must determine that they are not a flight risk or a danger to the community, that the request is not an attempt to delay the defendant’s prison sentence, and that the appeal raises significant questions of fact or law.
However, in the case of Elizabeth Holmes, the U.S. District Court Northern District of California has ruled that while Holmes is not considered a danger to the community or a flight risk, she has not presented any new evidence to support her appeal. Despite arguing that she did not promote a faulty product, the court rejected her claims, stating that these disputes do not directly relate to the charges for which she was convicted.
According to the court’s opinion, Elizabeth Holmes’ misrepresentations to Theranos investors extended beyond the functionality of Theranos’ technology. The court stated that Holmes had made several false statements, including those related to the company’s financial standing, reliance on third-party and commercially available devices, partnership with Walgreens, and validation by pharmaceutical companies.
At the age of 19, Elizabeth Holmes founded Theranos while still an undergraduate student at Stanford University. The company claimed that its technology could accurately screen patients for diseases with a small sample of blood from a finger prick, rather than a traditional blood draw. Despite the technology not functioning as advertised, Holmes managed to secure almost $1 billion in investments. The results of the tests were often incorrect, and the company frequently had to rely on commercially available blood analyzer machines to conduct its tests.
1 thought on “Elizabeth Holmes is not permitted to remain free during appeal, as per the ruling of a judge.”